Comments on: Ken Hoffman on judging Davekos

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:38:28 +0000

Pete ate legitimately. Ken Hoffman isn’t implying otherwise.

By: John

John — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:20:17 +0000

So does that mean Juliet had eaten only 17?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:20:04 +0000

Hey, lay off Pete. He’s still a nice guy. When he becomes a little more successful and turns into an arrogant jerkoff like some other mid ranked eaters then you can rip on him.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 03:47:05 +0000

Who’s Brian Subich? Is he an eater?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:46:48 +0000

It’s now July 16th, has Pete Davekos finished chewing from the 4th of July yet?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:12:48 +0000

“That’s against the rules………….”

What rules?????

By: anonymous

anonymous — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:56:15 +0000

What the F*** are you talking about? GO F yourself, buddy. Americans know how to celebrate and enjoy themselves….take it as you may. 70 next year!!!

By: Magma Mouth

Magma Mouth — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:29:53 +0000

This was especially important, since 9th through 13th place was at stake. Let’s hope they re-adjusted all that prize money…..everyone knows the hefty payouts Nathan’s provides for the top 13 finishers.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:43:50 +0000

Undoubtedly, Pete is following the excellent example of sportsmanship set by Juliet Lee. I think we owe both of them a round of applause.

By: Mega Munch

Mega Munch — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:18:13 +0000

Wow. Good for Pete. If only all eaters had the same integrity, then we wouldn’t have to rely on the scorekeepers to screw up the results. Sorry I’m being negative again.