"Furious" Pete Czerwinski has uploaded a video of a butter eating contest where he faced off against Kevin "LA Beast" Strahle.

August 21, 2013 at 12:18 pm by ojrifkin · More posts about:"Furious" Pete Czerwinski, Kevin Strahle, Videos | Permalink * Comments (21)

21 Comments »

  1. L.A. Beast said

    August 21, 2013 @ 12:37 pm

    Hey O.J. You need to report the facts correctly. I’m tired of you posting my name on here and then having to get emails from MLE. It was not a contest of any sorts. You make it out to be like it was a 10 minute organized contest with prize money. It was more like Pete eating butter and me eating butter in my apt for laughs. I hope one day I can find out who you are, so I can start stalking your social media and report assumptions to make you feel how you make others feel. I really hope your website crashes. Get a life

  2. Cerconey said

    August 21, 2013 @ 1:46 pm

    didn’t look like no contest to me

  3. ojrifkin said (Registered July 27, 2005)

    August 21, 2013 @ 2:52 pm

    Guyism.com is billing the video as an eating contest

    http://guyism.com/lifestyle/food/butter-eating-contest-furious-pete-vs-la-beast.html

  4. Troll said

    August 21, 2013 @ 3:26 pm

    Your such a troll OJ

  5. Oj the troll said

    August 21, 2013 @ 3:54 pm

    What if guyism.com reported that oj rifkin has a bed wetting problem and eats peices of shit for breakfast. You would have to post as is because that’s what they said right?

  6. Ummm... said

    August 21, 2013 @ 5:10 pm

    Pete called it a butter-off, also a challenge between him and LA. Beast said he was losing. So maybe not a contest, but an MLE eater and an independent eater were eating against one another..

  7. anonymous said

    August 21, 2013 @ 6:28 pm

    Way to go beast I love ya .

  8. about time said

    August 21, 2013 @ 7:02 pm

    La Beast I commend you for standing up to this meddling nosey no life sneak .She has gotten a number of competitive eaters in hot water with her actions which is none of her freaking biz.Then as always tries to defend herself with links to support her threads .Go away disappear and take youre no life database with you

  9. anonymous said

    August 21, 2013 @ 9:06 pm

    Keep in mind that La beast was doing stunts on YouTube long before he signed with MLE. Correct me if im wrong. but wasn’t it MLE that sought his services and not the other way around? Also I doubt the Sheas visit eatfeats. They visit eatfeats about as much as they visit BB .com. It was the usual eatfeats snitch that fwd the link

  10. anonymous said

    August 21, 2013 @ 9:28 pm

    When it comes to butter the Sheas are overprotective of Don Lermans record

  11. capn brian said (Registered November 17, 2010)

    August 22, 2013 @ 8:39 am

    first contest i have ever seen end in a giggle-off. you guys need to lighten up.

  12. Anonymous said

    August 22, 2013 @ 10:22 am

    The real problem here if beast is getting emails from MLE about this is not OJ reporting it or the choice of the word “contest” when it’s obviously just a silly stunt. The real problem is MLE’s overly controlling ways and power tripping. Place the blame where the blame lies.

  13. Anonymous said

    August 22, 2013 @ 10:35 am

    these guys have no idea what fun is til they do a challenge in the kitchen of Beautiful Brian Seiken. That is an experience they would never forget.

  14. TheTruth said

    August 22, 2013 @ 12:24 pm

    The Shea’s want a piece of that YOUTUBE MONEY!

  15. anonymous said

    August 22, 2013 @ 1:31 pm

    What youtube money? 100 thous hits =$100 . they havent even reached that yet. His money has nothing to do with them nor do they own any of those rights under that joke of a contract

  16. TheTruth said

    August 22, 2013 @ 3:34 pm

    You clearly know nothing about how youtube works with money.

  17. anonymous said

    August 22, 2013 @ 9:29 pm

    Ok smartass you explain in detail how YouTube works im listening

  18. anonymous said

    August 23, 2013 @ 1:04 am

    Dear anon 9:29, the burden to explain doesn’t fall on TheTruth@3:34. Look it up your damn self. This happens way too much in comments here, “if you can’t prove to me otherwise, my claims/assertions/accusations must be right.”

  19. anonymous said

    August 23, 2013 @ 9:17 am

    I am too lazy to look up anything. I think 131 assumption is correct

  20. Anonymous said

    August 23, 2013 @ 11:21 am

    Guilty until proven innocent is just a way of trying to coax people out in the wrong way. Makes no sense either. That shouldn’t be the way things work but they seem to here.

  21. Anonymous said

    August 23, 2013 @ 7:11 pm

    Happy 50th Birthday to the Shredder Allen Goldstein

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

Log in | Register | Comments by users who have not logged in will be held for approval