IFOCE top 30 2010 results comparison table

February 14, 2011 at 12:30 pm by ojrifkin · More posts about:Statistics

A table comparing head to head results since the start of 2010 for the current IFOCE top 30 and 4 others (Takeru Kobayashi, Joe LaRue, Dave Goldstein & Rich LeFevre) can be viewed after the jump

Total B Be P Be N Bi E Bo T Br J Ch M Co C Co P Da E De B Du A Go D Go S Go H Hu T Ja R Ke T Ko J La J Le R Le E Li M Ma B Mo A Mo A Os P Ph J Re K Ro B Sh B Su B Ta S Th D We
Bryan “Big Sexy” Beard (B Be) 7-50-2 13.6% – 0-6 0-1-1 1-2 0-3 0-4 0-1 1-1 0-1 0-2 0-0 0-1 2-0 0-1 0-0-1 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-3 0-3 0-1 0-0 1-1 0-1 0-5 2-0 0-0 0-6 0-1
Pat “Deep Dish” Bertoletti (P Be) 92-12 88.5% 6-0 – 2-0 6-0 7-0 1-7 4-0 6-0 5-0 5-1 0-0 1-0 3-0 3-0 1-0 3-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 4-0 0-0 1-0 1-0 4-1 3-0 2-0 0-0 3-0 0-0 8-2 2-0 3-0 7-0 1-0
“Nasty” Nathan Biller (N Bi) 10-37-5 24% 1-0-1 0-2 – 1-1-1 0-2 0-1 0-1 1-2-1 1-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-6 0-0 0-0 0-0-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-6-1 1-1 0-0 1-1 1-0 0-5 0-0 2-0 0-3 0-0
Eric “Badlands” Booker (E Bo) 29-38-4 43.7% 2-1 0-6 1-1-1 – 0-2-1 0-4 2-0 3-1-1 3-0 1-0 0-0 1-0 2-0 2-0 0-0 0-4 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 2-1-1 2-1 1-0 3-1 0-0 0-5 2-0 1-0 0-7 0-0
Tim “Gravy” Brown (T Br) 34-30-3 53% 3-0 0-7 2-0 2-0-1 – 0-4 2-0 5-0 3-0 0-3 0-0 1-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-4 0-0 0-0 2-0 2-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 1-1 2-0-1 2-0 0-0 1-0 0-0-1 0-4 0-0 4-1 0-5 0-0
Joey “Jaws” Chestnut (J Ch) 74-3-2 94.9% 4-0 7-1 1-0 4-0 4-0 – 2-0 4-0 3-0 4-0-1 0-0 2-0 2-0 3-0 0-0 4-0 1-0 1-0 0-0 4-0 1-0 1-0 0-0 5-0-1 2-0 1-0 1-0 1-0 1-0 5-1 1-0 2-0 2-1 1-0
Micah “Wing Kong” Collins (M Co) 23-29-1 44.3% 1-0 0-4 1-0 0-2 0-2 0-2 – 3-0 2-1 0-1 0-0 1-1 3-0 0-3-1 0-0 0-2 2-0 0-0 0-0 1-2 0-0 3-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 1-0 2-1 0-0 0-5 1-0 1-0 0-2 0-0
Crazy Legs Conti (C Co) 14-67-4 18.8% 1-1 0-6 2-1-1 1-3-1 0-5 0-4 0-3 – 0-6 0-3 0-0 0-2 0-2 1-3 0-0 0-6 0-0-1 0-0 0-1-1 0-2 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-2 3-1 0-1 0-1 1-1 1-0 0-6 1-0 2-1 0-5 1-0
Pete “PrettyBoy” Davekos (P Da) 12-47-2 21.3% 1-0 0-5 0-1 0-3 0-3 0-3 1-2 6-0 – 0-1 0-0 0-2-1 0-2 0-4 0-0 0-4 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-3 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0-1 1-1 0-1 0-0 0-6 0-0 1-0 0-4 0-0
Erik “The Red” Denmark (E De) 26-24-2 51.9% 2-0 1-5 2-0 0-1 3-0 0-4-1 1-0 3-0 1-0 – 0-0 1-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 1-2-1 2-1 1-0 0-0 1-0 3-0 0-2 0-0 1-1 0-3 1-0
Brian “Dud Light” Dudzinski (B Du) 3-6-1 35% 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 – 0-1 0-0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
Allen “Shredder” Goldstein (A Go) 18-22-1 45.1% 1-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-2 1-1 2-0 2-0-1 0-1 1-0 – 1-1 1-2 0-0 0-2 3-0 0-0 0-0 1-2 0-0 1-1 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 1-2 1-1 0-0 0-3 1-0 0-0 0-1 0-0
Dave “U. S. Male” Goldstein (D Go) 13-30-4 31.9% 0-2 0-3 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-2 0-3 2-0 2-0 0-0 0-0-1 1-1 – 1-3 0-0 0-1 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-1-1 0-0 2-0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-3 0-0 0-4 3-0-1 0-0 0-3 0-0
Sean “Flash” Gordon (S Go) 32-26-1 55.1% 1-0 0-3 2-0 0-2 0-1 0-3 3-0-1 3-1 4-0 0-1 0-0 2-1 3-1 – 0-0 1-2 1-0 0-0 0-0 1-2 0-0 3-0 0-0 0-1 3-0 1-0 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-5 1-0 1-0 0-3 0-0
Hall “Hoover” Hunt (H Hu) 0-3-1 12.5% 0-0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 – 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0
Tim “Eater X” Janus (T Ja) 69-17 80.2% 3-0 1-3 6-0 4-0 4-0 0-4 2-0 6-0 4-0 3-0 1-0 2-0 1-0 2-1 0-0 – 1-0 0-0 1-0 3-1 0-0 1-0 1-0 2-0 5-0 2-0 2-0 1-0 1-0 2-5 0-0 3-0 4-3 1-0
Russ “The Black Hole” Keeler (R Ke) 0-24-1 2% 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-2 0-0-1 0-2 0-0 0-1 0-3 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-1 – 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-2 0-0 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0
Takeru Kobayashi (T Ko) 0-1 0% 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 – 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
Joe “JamminJoe” LaRue (J La) 3-5-2 40% 0-0 0-0 0-0-1 1-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 1-0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 – 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-1 0-0
Juliet “The Lovely” Lee (J Le) 30-30-2 50% 2-0 0-4 1-1 1-1 1-2 0-4 2-1 2-0 3-0 1-1 0-0 2-1 1-0-1 2-1 0-0 1-3 2-0 0-0 0-0 – 0-1 1-0 1-0 0-0-1 1-1 1-1 1-0 2-0 1-0 0-5 0-0 1-0 0-3 0-0
Rich “The Locust” LeFevre (R Le) 3-1 75% 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 – 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
Eric “Steakbellie” Livingston (E Li) 5-21-2 21.4% 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-3 1-0 1-0 0-0 0-1 1-1 0-2-1 0-3 0-0 0-1 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 – 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-3 0-1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0
Marco “Mongo” Marquez (M Ma) 2-6 25% 1-0 0-1 1-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 – 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
“Big” Ben Monson (B Mo) 20-19-3 51.2% 3-0 1-4 0-0 2-0 1-1 0-5-1 1-0 2-0 1-0 2-1-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 – 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-3 0-0 1-0 1-2 2-0
Adrian “The Rabbit” Morgan (A Mo) 26-36-4 42.4% 3-0 0-3 6-0-1 1-2-1 0-2-1 0-2 0-1 1-3 0-0 1-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-3 0-0 0-5 0-0 0-0 1-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-1 – 1-2 0-0 2-0 2-0-1 0-5 1-0 2-0 0-4 3-0
Aaron “A-Train” Osthoff (A Os) 9-20-1 31.7% 1-0 0-2 1-1 1-2 0-2 0-1 0-0 1-0 0-0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 2-1 – 0-0 1-0 0-1 0-2 0-0 1-0 0-3 0-0
Pat “from Moonachie” Philbin (P Ph) 13-13 50% 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-1 1-0 1-1 0-0 2-0 2-1 2-0 0-2 0-0 0-2 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 – 0-1 0-0 0-2 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
“Buffalo” Jim Reeves (J Re) 19-26 42.2% 1-1 0-3 1-1 1-3 0-1 0-1 1-2 1-1 1-0 0-1 1-0 1-1 3-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 2-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-1 1-0 – 0-0 0-3 3-0 1-0 0-2 0-0
Kevin Ross (K Ro) 2-15-3 17.5% 1-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0-1 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-2-1 1-0 0-0 0-0 – 0-0 0-0-1 0-0 0-2 0-1
“Notorious” Bob Shoudt (B Sh) 92-18-1 83.3% 5-0 2-8 5-0 5-0 4-0 1-5 5-0 6-0 6-0 2-0 1-0 3-0 4-0 5-0 1-0 5-2 2-0 0-0 0-0 5-0 0-0 3-0 1-0 3-0 5-0 2-0 2-0 3-0 0-0 – 2-0 1-0 2-3-1 1-0
“Big” Brian Subich (B Su) 2-25-3 11.7% 0-2 0-2 0-0 0-2 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-3-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-3 0-0-1 0-2 – 0-0 0-2 0-1
Benjamin “The Wolf” Taylor (B Ta) 3-32 8.6% 0-0 0-3 0-2 0-1 1-4 0-2 0-1 1-2 0-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-2 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 – 0-2 0-1
Sonya “The Black Widow” Thomas (S Th) 72-16-1 81.5% 6-0 0-7 3-0 7-0 5-0 1-2 2-0 5-0 4-0 3-0 0-0 1-0 3-0 3-0 1-0 3-4 0-0 0-0 1-0 3-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 2-1 4-0 3-0 0-0 2-0 2-0 3-2-1 2-0 2-0 – 1-0
Damon “The Omen” Wells (D We) 4-12 25% 1-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-2 0-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-0 0-1 1-0 1-0 0-1 –

Comments (33)

33 Comments »

  1. anonymous said

    February 14, 2011 @ 12:50 pm

    all i have to say is after viewing this you obviously have a hell of alot of time on your hands

  2. Anonymous said

    February 14, 2011 @ 1:01 pm

    this would be beter if it had independant, aice, wolce

  3. stephanie_wu said (Registered August 17, 2010)

    February 14, 2011 @ 1:42 pm

    Wow! Great job! Is there any way to sort this by total winning percentage and compare this with the IFOCE top 50?

  4. stephanie_wu said (Registered August 17, 2010)

    February 14, 2011 @ 1:42 pm

    BTW, why isn’t IFOCE (or Sports Illustrated) publishing these sorts of stats? Why does OJ have to do this?

  5. Ranking System said

    February 14, 2011 @ 2:27 pm

    Now there’s a mathematical ranking system I could get behind and it pretty much reflects MLE standings.

    1. Joey “Jaws” Chestnut
    2. Pat “Deep Dish” Bertoletti
    3. “Notorious” Bob Shoudt
    4. Sonya “The Black Widow” Thomas
    5. Tim “Eater X” Janus
    6. Rich “The Locust” LeFevre
    7. Sean “Flash” Gordon
    8. Tim “Gravy” Brown
    9. Erik “The Red” Denmark
    10. “Big” Ben Monson
    11 (TIE). Pat “From Moonachi” Philbin
    11 (TIE). Juliet “The Lovely” Lee
    12. Allen “Shredder” Goldston
    13. Mich “Wing Kong” Collins
    14. Eric “Badlands” Booker
    15. Adrian “The Rabbit” Morgan
    16. “Buffalo” Jim Reeves
    17. Joe “Jamminjoe” LaRue
    18. Brian “Did LIght” Dudzinski
    19. Aaron “A Train” Osthoff
    20. Marco “Mongo” Marquez
    21. Dave “U.S. Male” Goldstein
    22. Damon “The Omen” Wells
    23. Eric “Steakbellie” Livingston
    24. Pete “PrettyBoy” Daekos
    25. Crazy Legs Conti
    26. Kevin Ross
    27. Bryan “Big Sexy” Beard
    28. Hall “Hoover” Hunt
    29. “Big” Bryan Subich
    30. Benjamin “The Wolf” Taylor
    31. Russ “The Black Hole” Keeler

  6. Stallion Italian said (Registered August 27, 2010)

    February 14, 2011 @ 3:02 pm

    IFOCE cares not one whit to do this. Sports Illustrated doesn’t consider competitive eating as a sport worthy of stats would be my guess. It is entertainment, brand recognition, that’s it, in my opinion. That applies to every contest and every eater and every challenge. IFOCE is a big business, the rest are far far smaller participants in competitive eating. MLE cares about its business, first and foremost, what it generates for themselves and the sponsors. The rest is a distant third.

  7. Rhonda Evans said (Registered March 6, 2008)

    February 14, 2011 @ 4:02 pm

    Getting too sophisticated is not cost-effective for MLE. It’s not worth the time and effort. I’ll say again, however, that for the most part they do a good job with the rankings. They can’t please everybody.

  8. Wrecking Ball said (Registered May 6, 2010)

    February 14, 2011 @ 4:47 pm

    i know this is going to sound stupid (and yes I know Hall is a better eater than me) but how does he get ranked doing one competition and I dont get ranked doing 5 or 6?

  9. Anonymous said

    February 14, 2011 @ 6:20 pm

    WB-They only looked at results of the IFOCE top 30 ranked plus The Locust, Kobi, US Male and Jammin Joe . I think you are 40, right?

  10. Anonymous said

    February 14, 2011 @ 6:22 pm

    I think this system is great and should be used to create an eatfeats top 30. Whoever put the work into this, all I can say is thank you and great job!

    Please continue to update this as the year goes on.

  11. anonymous said

    February 14, 2011 @ 8:19 pm

    Maybe you and a handful of others take this crap seriously. Stephanie Wu needs to have other interests

  12. ojrifkin said (Registered July 27, 2005)

    February 14, 2011 @ 8:53 pm

    I want to make a bigger grid with 50-60 rows, but I need to make some changes first. Team contests should be omitted. Currently teammates are considered to have tied.

  13. Cutter said (Registered November 9, 2010)

    February 15, 2011 @ 1:40 am

    Hall Hunt is way overrated then. Other than that it might reflect the rankings.

  14. Anonymous said

    February 15, 2011 @ 9:12 am

    Ranking System looks more like it. I was thinking there was no way those second tier eaters were listed first. Thanks for making a quicker list. Now all we need is a popularity poll for all the eaters in any venue. Haha Let’s do it!!!!!

  15. Great List!!! said

    February 15, 2011 @ 9:16 am

    Looks pretty legit to me. Thanks for putting so much time into it. The better eaters are easy to see and obviously in the Top 20. Great job guys!

  16. ???! said

    February 15, 2011 @ 10:13 am

    Who are half these ppl? Maybe they need a new league so they can get some publicity of their own. Get out of Joey and Sonyas shadows.

  17. Anonymous said

    February 15, 2011 @ 10:29 am

    this list NEEDS to include independants like pete and joe along with Aice and boones crew, well he doesnt have one but you know what i mean

  18. munchin mike said (Registered December 19, 2009)

    February 15, 2011 @ 10:41 am

    Id like to see other eaters on this list that arent IFOCE…but thats just me

  19. ojrifkin said (Registered July 27, 2005)

    February 15, 2011 @ 10:44 am

    I will make a non-IFOCE grid after fixing things so that team contests are omitted.

  20. Hell yeah said

    February 15, 2011 @ 11:19 am

    Squibb, Pete, Joe & all the others who don’t belly up to contracts and leagues. If ur gonna make an eaters poll it should be all eaters. The ppl who care about this list are on it. I wanna see total rankings. I wanna see the prize tally be more than cash. I wanna see who’s the best of the best… All prize payouts. That’ll keep it interesting and fuel our fires.

  21. Screw team events said

    February 15, 2011 @ 11:21 am

    Goid. Most of the great eaters go down on team events or descent eaters move up when they team up with the greats. I say team events should never count. No one ever eats equal amounts anyways. Keep it fair bro.

  22. Screw team events said

    February 15, 2011 @ 11:22 am

    -Good. My bad.

  23. Wrecking Ball said (Registered May 6, 2010)

    February 15, 2011 @ 11:29 am

    @cutter I know it would appear that Hall is overrated but he is without a doubt a top ten eater! Its due to getting married and other things going on in his real life that he hasent been able to compete more. If you have never seen him compete try checking him out, I think you will be impressed. Here are some of his stats that are listed on the MLE website: 34.5 Nathan’s Famous hot dogs in 10 min., 63 Krystals in 8 min., 23 grilled cheese sandwiches in 10 min.

  24. Dougy said

    February 15, 2011 @ 2:07 pm

    Thanks Hall er I mean cutter for your own update

  25. Cutter said (Registered November 9, 2010)

    February 15, 2011 @ 2:11 pm

    I think you two are in the same locality. Thus you would have a better understanding of his potential. I agree with you Wrecking Ball, but the numbers used in this comparison clearly have him overrated when compared head to head with other eaters. Numbers sometimes do not tell the whole story. Especially if he has been busy with other things, and has not been in many competitions as of late. Basically if he had more head to head action the math model used here would better reflect his standing in the MLE rankings.

    I am just a run of the mill eater (not yet capable of 20 hdb’s in 10 minutes), there is one great amateur in my locality and some other good ones as well. You tend to get to know your local eaters well. We all have different capabilities. Not all great eaters right now have even done an event sanctioned by one of the recognized eating organizations. Which is why it is great that over the course of a calender year MLE does contests all across the country.

  26. Cutter said (Registered November 9, 2010)

    February 15, 2011 @ 3:37 pm

    Dougy… If you paid more attention to what was wrote before you jumped to conclusions you would see that i was pointing out the large gap between Hall Hunt’s current ranking and what might be derived by this model, when I pointed out that he was overrated that is kind of like me slamming his abilities. I am not Hall Hunt. I am nobody but myself. I realize now that there is a reason that math model here grades him so poorly. If instead of comparing head to head stuff you compared numbers of HDB’s or other foods across contest (certainly another way to do a model), then you would find Hall Hunt might actually be underrated.

  27. Wrecking Ball said (Registered May 6, 2010)

    February 15, 2011 @ 3:46 pm

    Hall and I both live in Florida but I have only met him once (at pickles last year) and all I really know about him is what I read here and we both did an article for the pickle cometition. He seems like a real nice guy and there is no question that he can eat. The link to that article was posted awhile ago but here it is again if you want to read about him (@cutter)http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2010-10-21/restaurants/competitive-eating-pickle-style/

  28. Stallion Italian said (Registered August 27, 2010)

    February 15, 2011 @ 4:59 pm

    Hall Hunt is an excellent eater and a fine person from what I have read. I do wonder whether or not he will continue to be involved in competitive eating. Perhaps someone knows the answer or we shall simply have to wait for the contests to begin. Not having any ability to do any kind of charts, never mind statistics, one thought occurred to me about the comparisons of number of contests and results. Is my thinking correct about this? An example would be when people take standardized tests, the methods of scoring can be different. In one test, one might be credited for only correct answers with no deduction taken for those wrong. In that case, guessing an answer makes sense, you are not penalized. In the other way of scoring, your incorrect answers are deducted from the correct ones so guessing is more difficult as well as rushing to finish everything. Okay, now that I wrote that, I have no idea how this could be used in the competitive eating analysis, just a wandering thought.

  29. Big Cheese said

    February 15, 2011 @ 9:36 pm

    I think Hall is rated about right at #28

  30. Cutter said (Registered November 9, 2010)

    February 15, 2011 @ 11:12 pm

    I am not a mensa member like Hunt, however I am pretty smart. It is likely a head to head analysis doesn’t do him any justice because of the particular eaters that he lost to. 34.5 hdbs in 10 mins is enough for me. Besides you never here a bad word about him. It is probably more likely that MLE is more correct in their assesment than this head to head model.

  31. Anonymous said

    February 16, 2011 @ 8:39 am

    so after all of this…..lets see ALL the major non-ifoce guys on here. I wanna see the young studs that if given the experience and chance can compete with the big dogs. I wanna see the stonies, the excels, the wus. the longos, the bickels, and the brunellis of the world on this list. And yes i know some of these arent top 25 but top 50??
    I think at least 2 of these guys could be in the top 35 in ifoce.

  32. All eaters!!! said

    February 16, 2011 @ 9:33 am

    I want to see an all eaters poll!!! Good, bad, and ugly contests. All wins, all losses, no teams, no leagues. Let’s see who is the best of the best!!!!

  33. Stallion Italian said (Registered August 27, 2010)

    February 16, 2011 @ 9:50 am

    The best of the best would be a subjective judgment at best. Basically, there is no such animal. All eaters? That would include the world, at least those of us who have food aplenty.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

Log in | Register | Comments by users who have not logged in will be held for approval