New Poll: evolution of IFOCE contract

September 12, 2007 at 3:17 pm by ojrifkin · More posts about:Contracts, Organizations

The new poll asks how you think the restrictions in the IFOCE contract will change over time.

Comments (7)

7 Comments »

  1. Rabbi Yitzy said

    September 12, 2007 @ 6:47 pm

    You know dis is a jewish haliday . It is a shemsach if you are a jew typing mashenana nonsense on a computer instead of prahhying in da temple. For vunce in you life stop cammandering mid food and say a prayer

  2. Mega Munch said

    September 12, 2007 @ 10:14 pm

    Good thing I’m not Jewish. Meshugana!

  3. Carey said

    September 13, 2007 @ 8:35 am

    It was predicted by someone earlier that the next step is for them to tell you where you can eat publicly, that way they have the power to ban a restaurant who doesn’t want to participate in sponsoring them (or who chose to sponsor a rival organization)
    After that, you will be required to wear a Nathan’s shirt 3 days a week.

  4. Mega Munch said

    September 13, 2007 @ 11:30 am

    Thanksgiving dinners shall be limited to seconds only (no thirds!) and only two slices of pie. Also, prior approval must be granted in order to “super size” or “biggie size” any fast food value meals. A hotline will be set up to facilitate this approval process.

  5. Anonymous said

    September 13, 2007 @ 1:26 pm

    All competitive eaters will be banned from eating at buffets and will be given severe restrictions on what they can order in restaurants. For instance, if eating at McDonalds or Burger King, no more than two sandwiches can be eaten with one order of fries (small-large) and a small or medium drink (refills will not be allowed). If steaks, prime rib or other entrees are ordered they must be under 14 ounces and total weight of the dinner must be under 3 pounds. Furthermore, eaters will be expected to bring scales with them and videotape the entire process from start to finish to ensure they didn’t have a chance to sneak in extra food.

  6. Carey said

    September 13, 2007 @ 1:56 pm

    You think you will actually be allowed to enter a fast food restaurant that isn’t on the approved list of public places to be seen at?

  7. Tom G said (Registered May 27, 2007)

    September 13, 2007 @ 5:56 pm

    The question is completely immaterial. The important question is why so many people are not allowed to sign the contract. Only when they stop banning so many people for capricious and discriminatory reasons will changes to the language have any meaning

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave a Comment

Log in | Register | Comments by users who have not logged in will be held for approval