Don “Moses” Lerman reports 36 lb. weight loss

December 1, 2006 at 11:20 am by ojrifkin · More posts about:Don "Moses" Lerman

Don “Moses” Lerman reports a drop in body mass to 227 lb. from 263 lb. last July. He intends to return to competition when his weight drops to 170 lb., which he projects will be in the spring of 2007.

Comments (15)

15 Comments »

  1. Reality said

    December 1, 2006 @ 11:34 am

    Don, there is no way in hell you will get under 200. It’s a miracle as is that you are around 225 now.

  2. Rhonda Evans said

    December 1, 2006 @ 11:48 am

    Keep it up Don! I’ve NO DOUBT you’ll reach your goal. Also, Hydroxycut works well, by the way.

  3. donmoseslerman said

    December 1, 2006 @ 1:41 pm

    this is don lerman 9 yrs ago I was 280 lbs with a 50 wasist and a 3x shirt and I REDUCED TO A 32 waist , small shirt and 142 lbs . I shall reach my goa once again!

  4. donmoseslerman said

    December 1, 2006 @ 1:43 pm

    That should read goal once again…don lerman

  5. the boy king said

    December 1, 2006 @ 1:56 pm

    umm…. i don’t want to be a miser, but the see-saw of your weight gain and loss might be harder on your body than you think.

    When you get to your goal this time, set a new goal to stay there (or at least near.)

    Good Luck

  6. Ed Charles said

    December 1, 2006 @ 2:03 pm

    Oh god will he ever go away. I guess the best is to just ignore the whackos

  7. I said

    December 1, 2006 @ 2:18 pm

    So ignore Ed, too.

  8. Anonymous Coward said

    December 1, 2006 @ 2:30 pm

    If Don starts competing at 170 and improves, it will lend credence to the “belt of fat” theory. Ed Krachie could use it as a case study in an updated version of “The Impact of Adipose Tissue on Competitive Eating”. Take that, New England Journal of Medicine!

  9. donmoseslerman said

    December 1, 2006 @ 3:42 pm

    I was 165lbs at the gluttonbowl I had gained 23 lbs practicing for nathans in 2001 when I won the bean title I was 170lbS. I will return to 170 by spring of 2007

  10. Richard Simmons said

    December 1, 2006 @ 3:49 pm

    Be that as it may, donmoseslerman, but the severe yo-yoing is really bad. It’s actually better to be consistently fat or thin rather than fat, thin, fat, thin, fat, thin, and all.

  11. Rhonda Evans said

    December 1, 2006 @ 3:52 pm

    I believe the Belt of Fat theory to be alive and well. I honestly believe, for instance, that if Cookie were to get down below 250 or so, he would be giving the new kids as much competition as they could handle.

    I also believe, no, I know, that when Moses hits 170 he will again be near the top of his game, eating well over 20 Dogs, etc. As TBK hit on, the secret is to be able to maintain that weight; as there seems to be a direct, inverse correlation between the amount of stomach fat and the amount of food that one is capable of consuming.

  12. Anonymous Coward said

    December 1, 2006 @ 4:40 pm

    Well, Don, what do you think? Do you feel that, in your personal experience, the belt of fat is legitimate?

  13. donmoseslerman said

    December 1, 2006 @ 6:45 pm

    In my case the belt of fat may be valid , I was better eater thin then fat , for me my legs no longer supported my body and I found it hard to stand for a 12 min. contest.

  14. Badlands Booker said

    December 10, 2006 @ 8:56 am

    You can do it Don, you did it before. im using your 130 pound weight loss back in 2000 to help inspire me to drop weight. im down 50 pounds so far so dont quit, control your emotions to fall off the wagon and prevail.

  15. donmoseslerman said

    December 10, 2006 @ 4:02 pm

    thanks eric I know that you will lose the weight iwill keeo to my diet too ..don

RSS feed for comments on this post

Leave a Comment

Log in | Register | Comments by users who have not logged in will be held for approval